[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
RE: Institutional subscription question
- To: <liblicense-l@lists.yale.edu>
- Subject: RE: Institutional subscription question
- From: "John Cox" <John.E.Cox@btinternet.com>
- Date: Fri, 16 May 2008 19:38:48 EDT
- Reply-to: liblicense-l@lists.yale.edu
- Sender: owner-liblicense-l@lists.yale.edu
Chen Xiaotian's posting is a confusion of different scenarios. What I set out to state is the strict legal position, which is based in contract (for the personal subscriber) and tort (inducing breach of contract by the library). As I have said in another posting, publishers are concerned about damage to current subscription revenue. No publisher is going to initiate proceedings based on a bequest - the subscriber is dead, and the library cannot be held responsible for the donor's will. Doctors, in my experience, do not leave copies of medical or other learned journals in their waiting rooms - more likely mass-market magazines, which are not the issue here. There have been a number of legal actions brought by publishers over the years, most of which are settled out of court. In recent years publishers successfully stopped a subscription agent in the USA from ordering personal subscriptions and exporting the copies to Asia at the institutional subscription rate, aiming to enrich himself at the publishers' expense. Cases have been brought by groups of publishers to stop the sale of 'international student editions', which are priced low exclusively for students in developing countries, to students in the USA and in other developed countries; this was settled out of court in 2003, and the issue there was directly analogous to the personal/institutional subscription here. John Cox Managing Director John Cox Associates Ltd Rookwood, Bradden TOWCESTER, Northants NN12 8ED United Kingdom E-mail: John.E.Cox@btinternet.com Web: www.johncoxassociates.com -----Original Message----- [mailto:owner-liblicense-l@lists.yale.edu] On Behalf Of Chen, Xiaotian Sent: 16 May 2008 00:02 To: liblicense-l@lists.yale.edu Subject: RE: Institutional subscription question Bernie's example may not be practical and it is not likely to become common practice. However, here are some common practices: * Individuals donate their journal collection to library after retirement or death. * Doctor's offices or any place has a waiting room keep personal subscriptions for customers to read. Can John provide case name or citation number of the "successful legal action" against this practice? It seems to contradict to US Code (17 U.S.C. 109) mentioned by Kevin Smith of Duke. --- Xiaotian Chen Electronic Services Librarian Bradley University Peoria, Illinois 61625 http://hilltop.bradley.edu/~chen/index.html
- Prev by Date: RE: Institutional subscription question
- Next by Date: Re: Institutional subscription question
- Previous by thread: RE: Institutional subscription question
- Next by thread: Re: Institutional subscription question
- Index(es):