[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: Institutional subscription question
- To: liblicense-l@lists.yale.edu
- Subject: Re: Institutional subscription question
- From: Eleanor Cook <cookei@appstate.edu>
- Date: Wed, 14 May 2008 16:45:43 EDT
- Reply-to: liblicense-l@lists.yale.edu
- Sender: owner-liblicense-l@lists.yale.edu
This is such an old trick -- I used to have to explain to faculty (over and over) back in the 1980's and 1990's during serials cancellation reviews why this was considered, at the very least, unethical. The premise being that the (less expensive) personal subscriptions are subsidized by the (far more expensive) institutional subscriptions. Some of the STM publishers used to print right on the cover of journal issues if it was an institutional or personal subscription and put some kind of statement about not substituting. If you could delve into the early archives of this list and others (Marcia Tuttle's Newsletter on Serials Pricing comes to mind, as well as SERIALST) you would find this discussion repeated several times at least. This is not a new idea. However, in the age of electronic journals, it's a moot point. You can't really do this in the e-environment. And this is <not> a problem for consumer magazines -- if your faculty want to donate their Time and Newsweek, I hardly think anyone would care, but then, those kinds of subscriptions don't cost thousands of dollars each. Whether this is legal or not, couldn't say, I am not a lawyer. Eleanor Cook (formerly a Serials Librarian) Eleanor I. Cook Professor & Intellectual Property & Copyright Librarian Belk Library, ASU Box 32026 Appalachian State University Boone, NC 28608-2026 cookei@appstate.edu
- Prev by Date: RE: Institutional subscription question
- Next by Date: Request for publisher policies
- Previous by thread: RE: Institutional subscription question
- Next by thread: RE: Institutional subscription question
- Index(es):