[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Chronicle of HE and Laura Gasaway on Georgia State case
- To: liblicense-l@lists.yale.edu
- Subject: Chronicle of HE and Laura Gasaway on Georgia State case
- From: "James J. O'Donnell" <jod@georgetown.edu>
- Date: Mon, 12 May 2008 19:37:04 EDT
- Reply-to: liblicense-l@lists.yale.edu
- Sender: owner-liblicense-l@lists.yale.edu
>From the issue dated May 16, 2008 LINKED IN WITH... Laura N. Gassaway, a copyright expert who is monitoring a lawsuit brought by publishers challenging a university's practice of putting material on electronic reserve. How a lawsuit over electronic reserves could affect colleges By ANDREA L. FOSTER Ms. Gassaway, associate dean for academic affairs and a professor at the University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill School of Law, says that a lawsuit recently filed against Georgia State University regarding electronic reserves could have implications for how colleges distribute course material online. The suit, brought by three publishers -- Oxford University Press, Cambridge University Press, and SAGE Publications -- alleges that Georgia State professors infringed publishers' copyrights by "inviting students" to download, view, and print material from thousands of copyrighted works. Ms. Gassaway's remarks assume the details of Georgia State's practices, as described in the complaint, are accurate. Q. Is Georgia State's use of electronic course material different from other institutions? A. If you have a continuum where on one side are institutions that always seek permission before putting things on electronic reserve and on the other side are institutions that never seek permission, Georgia State appears to be on that far end of almost never seeking permission. My belief is that more libraries fall somewhere in the middle. They certainly believe that some of the material they put on electronic reserve can be disseminated under fair use. But they believe they need to get permission and pay royalties to use other material. Q. Are there other reasons the publishers sued Georgia State? A. The publishers may have been interested in showing that state-supported institutions are not immune from litigation. State-supported entities can't be sued for damages. And the publishers in this case did not seek damages. They asked only for an injunction. Q. Is this lawsuit a warning from publishers to other institutions that they'll be sued, too, unless they negotiate with publishers about their use of e-reserves? A. One could certainly take it that way. Several other institutions, once they got cease-and-desist letters from publishers about their use of online course material, developed policies and began to pay royalties. Q. What's your best guess of how this case will be resolved? A. It will settle. Q. What would such a settlement look like? A. Georgia State could be required to adopt certain policies in order for the publishers to drop their litigation. What other institutions have done is to develop and publicize policies and remind their faculty about them. copyright 2008 Chronicle of Higher Education
- Prev by Date: RE: Certification and Dissemination
- Next by Date: Case Study: Open Access Yields Solid Growth for Hindawi
- Previous by thread: On Parasitism and Double-Dipping
- Next by thread: Re: Chronicle of HE and Laura Gasaway on Georgia State case
- Index(es):