[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: Rewarding Reviewers
- To: liblicense-l@lists.yale.edu
- Subject: Re: Rewarding Reviewers
- From: Gene Sprouse <sprouse@ridge.aps.org>
- Date: Sun, 30 Mar 2008 21:51:37 EDT
- Reply-to: liblicense-l@lists.yale.edu
- Sender: owner-liblicense-l@lists.yale.edu
The APS journals rely on the volunteer service of over 42,000 active referees. We have kept records for over 20 years of the quality, number and timeliness of referee reports, and we have recently announced an award program to recognize about 130 of these referees each year as "Outstanding Referees". To initiate the program, we have selected a larger number of 534 referees that have been exceptionally dedicated over many years. The award is a pin, a certificate, and the recognition of their peers for an outstanding job well done. We have chosen recognition rather than money as a reward, in order to keep the costs of our publications as low as possible. In addition, most scientists recognize that participating as a referee in the peer review process is an obligation if one publishes. By making the award very selective, we draw attention to those who have shown exceptional dedication and service, much as Universities have teaching awards to recognize those who are exceptionally dedicated and skillful. The announcement of this award each year is an opportunity to to emphasize to the community the importance of peer review, and to raise awareness of the obligation. We considered recognizing a larger fraction each year, but found that the logistics of it was difficult, and we also thought we were more likely to alienate referees not recognized if the award were less selective. We will continue to thank every active referee in an annual letter. The honorees come from 33 different countries, with large contingents from the US, Germany, UK, Canada, and France. The award has been very well received, and we have had only one complaint about our selection process. The comments from the awardees have been wonderful to read: (Below are three of the more than 400 responses) > Thank you very much for this delightful and surprising e-mail! > (This must be my quickest ever response to the APS Editorial > Office, I fear.) I am delighted to accept. > Thank you for your message. I don't know if my referee's work > deserves any special recognition; I only did my duty towards > the community of physicists in the same way as I was glad to > have my own manuscripts honestly and constructively refereed. > I appreciate very much that the APS has included me among the > outstanding referees. I definitely feel honored by this > choice. It is a strong encouragement for continuing to take > seriously the job of providing careful, fair and competent > reports on manuscripts submitted to the APS journals. This is > a service not only to the APS journals but to the physics > community in general, which I have always felt to be important > and crucial for the soundness and credibility of the field. You can read more about the program and view the list of awardees at: http://publish.aps.org/OutstandingReferees Gene Sprouse Editor-in-Chief American Physical Society
- Prev by Date: Analog to Digital Query
- Previous by thread: Re: Rewarding reviewers
- Next by thread: Important information regarding journal transfers to SAGE in 2008
- Index(es):