[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: Rewarding reviewers
- To: liblicense-l@lists.yale.edu
- Subject: Re: Rewarding reviewers
- From: Gavin Baker <gavin@gavinbaker.com>
- Date: Thu, 27 Mar 2008 20:35:27 EDT
- Reply-to: liblicense-l@lists.yale.edu
- Sender: owner-liblicense-l@lists.yale.edu
Mark Funk wrote:
The editorial in the March issue of Nature Nanotechnology (3#3, 2008, p,119: "Who'd be a referee?") talks about the efforts that journal reviewers put in: the average review takes about 8.6 hours and is completed within 3-4 weeks, The last two paragraphs talk about changes in publishing, particularly open access. The last sentence caught my eye:BioMed Central offers a discount for reviewers: http://www.biomedcentral.com/info/about/apcfaq#discount
"For a fee, some publishers (but not Nature Publishing Group) are willing to make a paper open access, but authors of such papers would certainly be justified in asking to have the fees waived in return for refereeing."
Does any hybrid OA publisher reward their reviewers with waiving OA fees? It seems like the least they could do.
BMC is a fee-based OA publisher, but not hybrid OA.
--
Gavin Baker
http://www.gavinbaker.com/
gavin@gavinbaker.com
- Prev by Date: RE: APA Style Guide to Electronic References license question
- Next by Date: RE: APA Style Guide to Electronic References license question
- Previous by thread: Rewarding reviewers
- Next by thread: Re: Rewarding reviewers
- Index(es):