[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: Publisher Proxy Deposit Is A Potential Trojan Horse

To: liblicense-l@lists.yale.edu
Subject: Re: Publisher Proxy Deposit Is A Potential Trojan Horse
From: Thomas Krichel <krichel@openlib.org>
Date: Wed, 19 Mar 2008 23:29:32 EDT
Reply-to: liblicense-l@lists.yale.edu
Sender: owner-liblicense-l@lists.yale.edu

   Stevan Harnad writes

> (7) University-external, subject-based self-archiving does not 
> scale up to cover all of OA output space: it is divergent, 
> divisive, arbitrary, incoherent and unnecessary.

   So, do you reccommend arXiv, RePEc, E-LIS, etc to close down?

   Disclosure: I am the creator of RePEc and involved in E-LIS.

   Cheers,

   Thomas Krichel                    http://openlib.org/home/krichel
                                 RePEc:per:1965-06-05:thomas_krichel
   phone: +7 383 330 6813                       skype: thomaskrichel

Prev by Date: Re: New License language - what meaning?
Next by Date: RE: Deposit Mandates as part of Publisher Services
Previous by thread: Re: Publisher Proxy Deposit Is A Potential Trojan Horse
Next by thread: Re: Publisher Proxy Deposit Is A Potential Trojan Horse
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread