[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: Good-bye, Long Tail
- To: liblicense-l@lists.yale.edu
- Subject: Re: Good-bye, Long Tail
- From: "B.G. Sloan" <bgsloan2@yahoo.com>
- Date: Fri, 14 Mar 2008 12:50:47 EDT
- Reply-to: liblicense-l@lists.yale.edu
- Sender: owner-liblicense-l@lists.yale.edu
Joe Esposito bsays: " WSJ is a subscription site." This article is available from other sources, e.g: http://tinyurl.com/2r5dua Bernie Sloan "Joseph J. Esposito" <espositoj@gmail.com> wrote: Interesting (and long-awaited) article in the Wall St. Journal on Borders' decision to reduce the number of titles it stocks in favor of giving fewer titles more prominent display. WSJ is a subscription site. The article is dated March 12 and is titled "Borders Tries About-face on Shclves." The byline is Jeffrey Trachtenberg. >From the article: "In a radical move aimed at jump-starting sales, the nation's second-largest book retailer is sharply increasing the number of titles it displays on shelves with the covers face-out. Because that takes up more room than the traditional spine-out style, the new approach will require a typical Borders superstore to shrink its number of titles by 5% to 10%." The article goes on to note that tests show that when inventory is reduced and fewer titles are supported (but more aggressively), sales rise by 9%. Commentators contacted by the reporter note that people "don't want choice" and that Borders' decision will favor larger publishers. This is the attention economy at work. What a windfall open access is for Elsevier and Springer. Joe Esposito
- Prev by Date: Author's Rights: Going Too Far - Or Industry Standard?
- Next by Date: Re: Authors rights: Going too far
- Previous by thread: Good-bye, Long Tail
- Next by thread: Re: Good-bye, Long Tail
- Index(es):