[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: Authors rights: Going too far
- To: liblicense-l@lists.yale.edu, "Joseph J. Esposito" <espositoj@gmail.com>
- Subject: Re: Authors rights: Going too far
- From: Phil Davis <pmd8@cornell.edu>
- Date: Wed, 12 Mar 2008 21:54:38 EDT
- Reply-to: liblicense-l@lists.yale.edu
- Sender: owner-liblicense-l@lists.yale.edu
How about the point of view of an author? I would be livid if my librarian told me that my favorite journal were to be canceled because she thought the publisher was treating me unfairly. My mother may have told me to eat my greens when I was a child; having my librarian tell me what is (and what isn't) good for me as an author seems both arrogant and ridiculous.
--Phil Davis
Joseph J. Esposito wrote:
Heather Morrison wrote: "Perhaps it is timely for collections librarians to add Author's Rights as a key criterion, when evaluating journal subscriptions to add, or to cancel?" JE: Perhaps some lawyers on this list would like to offer a point of view, but this suggestion seems to me to go too far. It is disconcerting to suggest that librarians insinuate themselves in the contracts between authors and publishers, whose dealings are a private matter. Joe Esposito
- Prev by Date: Digital Scholarship in the University Tenure and Promotion Process
- Next by Date: Good-bye, Long Tail
- Previous by thread: Authors rights: Going too far
- Next by thread: Re: Authors rights: Going too far
- Index(es):