[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
RE: ejournals and ILL
- To: <liblicense-l@lists.yale.edu>
- Subject: RE: ejournals and ILL
- From: "Adelaide Fletcher" <fletchera@denvermedlib.org>
- Date: Tue, 4 Mar 2008 17:32:28 EST
- Reply-to: liblicense-l@lists.yale.edu
- Sender: owner-liblicense-l@lists.yale.edu
Why not allow a mediated system, then, where requests are filtered by a human who then downloads an electronic copy and emails it to the requester? This would not change the definition of authorized users, and it would significantly reduce the burden on library staff and the waste of paper, ink, time, and electricity. ********************* Adelaide Fletcher, MLIS, AHIP Electronic Resources Librarian Denver Medical Library Presbyterian/St. Luke's Medical Center Denver, CO 80218 303.839.6670 -----Original Message----- [mailto:owner-liblicense-l@lists.yale.edu] On Behalf Of Menefee, Daviess (ELS-NYC) Sent: Monday, March 03, 2008 6:19 PM To: liblicense-l@lists.yale.edu Subject: ejournals and ILL In response to Beth Jacoby's question of Feb. 29: First, I want to assure you that the license you received was current when you received it in October, 2007. Certain changes to the template were made in December and do not affect the ILL clause other than to include book chapters and make certain terminology changes (e.g. eliminating the term Excerpt). We will be happy to work with you to incorporate the new language. As to why we require printing first (and our understanding is that most publishers also do this), the reasons are fairly simple. First, this is most closely analogous to the traditional and well-understood practices of print, where one photocopies or scans the print. What is received by the requester is about the same quality copy. Second, we are concerned about those within the ILL community who advocate an unmediated system, where requesters enter their requests electronically and these requests are automatically routed electronically to a library holding the material. The article can be retrieved and returned to the requester without the need for human intervention. While we can appreciate the efficiency of such a system, it effectively changes the definition of Authorized User in our agreement from those within the subscribing institution to anyone anywhere in the world. Daviess Menefee Library Relations Elsevier
- Prev by Date: March issue of the SPARC Open Access Newsletter
- Next by Date: Re: ejournals and ILL
- Previous by thread: ejournals and ILL
- Next by thread: Re: ejournals and ILL
- Index(es):