[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: On OA, Self-Interest and Coercion
- To: liblicense-l@lists.yale.edu
- Subject: Re: On OA, Self-Interest and Coercion
- From: "James J. O'Donnell" <jod@georgetown.edu>
- Date: Mon, 28 Jan 2008 19:22:02 EST
- Reply-to: liblicense-l@lists.yale.edu
- Sender: owner-liblicense-l@lists.yale.edu
I apologize to the list's readers for having triggered a lengthy message from my old friend Stevan Harnad on the question of mandates. Let it suffice to say that he and I disagree, as scientists are wont to do, over the interpretation of data. I know that provosts issue "mandates" to their faculties with reluctance, forasmuch as our institutions are built on collegiality and faculty governance. I shall not get into a slanging match, because I admire Stevan and his zeal for the good cause we share (finding the best way to get the most and best information to the greatest number of readers) and because the details of the argument are long familiar to weary readers of this list. As a single self-indulgence, I will observe that I am the seniormost online publisher of an absolutely 100% open-access journal in the history of the humanities (Bryn Mawr Classical Review). We intend to remain OA, but we well understand the costs and risks of our business model. Jim O'Donnell Georgetown
- Prev by Date: Call for Nominations--First Annual Coutts Award for Innovation
- Next by Date: Release of the 1st DRIVER Summit Report
- Previous by thread: On OA, Self-Interest and Coercion
- Next by thread: Re: On OA, Self-Interest and Coercion
- Index(es):