[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
RE: Google Print - Peter Brantley in Chronicle of Higher Ed
- To: <liblicense-l@lists.yale.edu>
- Subject: RE: Google Print - Peter Brantley in Chronicle of Higher Ed
- From: "Tony McSean" <tmcsean@hollar.co.uk>
- Date: Wed, 23 Jan 2008 22:00:09 EST
- Reply-to: liblicense-l@lists.yale.edu
- Sender: owner-liblicense-l@lists.yale.edu
Well spotted, Bernie. Looks to me like a classic example of "I think this is very bad because, er . . ." Many years ago when I catalogued new books for a living I used to feel deep background unease that however long I spent on subject analysis neither I nor library catalogue technology was remotely capable of coming up with an adequate pointer to the subject content of a 350 page academic monograph. This was particularly true about disciplines like, dare I say it, sociology books which aren't always "about" anything in the sense that the Dewey classification (and others) seems to demand. Back in the mid 70s I never imagined a situation when digitising and networking would be feasible, but while it might bring the demise of scholarly libraries as we've known them, it's hard to imagine anything that would be a more effective start in bringing the masses flooding into the cultural and scientific archive. Tony Tony McSean +44 7946 291780 -----Original Message----- From: owner-liblicense-l@lists.yale.edu [mailto:owner-liblicense-l@lists.yale.edu] On Behalf Of B.G. Sloan Sent: 23 January 2008 01:00 To: liblicense-l@lists.yale.edu Subject: Re: Google Print - Peter Brantley in Chronicle of Higher Ed I liked this one: Q. How does Google Book Search hurt libraries? A. The libraries have to make a significant commitment in terms of getting their books to Google. The books have to come off the shelves. Then after being scanned they have to be put back on the shelves. And this resource drain is going to limit the ability of libraries to engage in other activities. My comment: Doesn't it seem like the cost of taking a book off a shelf and putting it back on the shelf would be well worth the cost of getting the book digitized for "free"? That is, wouldn't it be cheaper to absorb the cost of moving the book to and from the shelf with "free" digization, rather than the cost of moving the book back and forth PLUS the cost of digitization by going with something other than Google? Bernie Sloan
- Prev by Date: Re: Google Print - Peter Brantley in Chronicle of Higher Ed
- Next by Date: ELPUB2008 - CFP deadline EXTENDED to January 31, 2008
- Previous by thread: Re: Google Print - Peter Brantley in Chronicle of Higher Ed
- Next by thread: Re: European Research Council Mandate
- Index(es):