[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
RE: STM comments on U. S. National Institutes of Health Unfunded Mandate
- To: <liblicense-l@lists.yale.edu>
- Subject: RE: STM comments on U. S. National Institutes of Health Unfunded Mandate
- From: "Hunsucker, R.L." <R.L.Hunsucker@uva.nl>
- Date: Mon, 7 Jan 2008 22:31:04 EST
- Reply-to: liblicense-l@lists.yale.edu
- Sender: owner-liblicense-l@lists.yale.edu
Ahem: > . . . their primary mission of maximizing the dissemination of > knowledge through economically self-sustaining business models > . . . OK, since we're singing the praises here of "an evidence-based approach" what is the evidence that such is truly the "primary mission" of (at least the largest players in) the STM-club ? I'm all ears. - L. Hunsucker ( And are the shareholders aware of this, I wonder ? ) ________________________________ From: owner-liblicense-l@lists.yale.edu on behalf of Janice Kuta Sent: Sat 1/5/2008 3:45 AM To: liblicense-l@lists.yale.edu Subject: STM comments on U. S. National Institutes of Health Unfunded Mandate FOR IMMEDIATE RELEASE STM comments on U. S. National Institutes of Health Unfunded Mandate OXFORD, UK, 4 JANUARY 2008 - STM today expressed disappointment with the recent passage of legislation in the United States. This legislation (the Consolidated Appropriations Act of 2007 (H.R. 2764)) includes provisions directing the National Institutes of Health to mandate that investigators who are supported by grants from the National Institutes of Health must deposit their manuscripts directly into the National Library of Medicine's PubMed Central database no later than 12 months after the official date of publication. The legislation neither provides compensation for the added-value of services that these manuscripts have received from publishers nor does it earmark funds to ensure the economic sustainability of the broad and systematic archiving this sort of project requires. It also undermines a key intellectual property right known as copyright - long a cornerstone used to foster creativity and innovation. STM believes that this legislation establishes an unfunded government mandate with an unknown impact on the advancement of science and puts at risk a system which has enabled more research to be available to more scientists in more countries than at any point in the history of science. [SNIP]
- Prev by Date: Institutional Repositories, Tout de Suite
- Next by Date: Re: Brantley blog post
- Previous by thread: RE: STM comments on U. S. National Institutes of Health Unfunded Mandate
- Next by thread: RE: STM comments on U. S. National Institutes of Health Unfunded Mandate
- Index(es):