[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
RE: NIH mandate - institutional repositories
- To: <liblicense-l@lists.yale.edu>
- Subject: RE: NIH mandate - institutional repositories
- From: "Sally Morris \(Morris Associates\)" <sally@morris-assocs.demon.co.uk>
- Date: Fri, 30 Nov 2007 18:17:53 EST
- Reply-to: liblicense-l@lists.yale.edu
- Sender: owner-liblicense-l@lists.yale.edu
The irony is that so few academics are convinced that self- archiving is good for them (like cod liver oil?) and that it takes mandates to get them to do it Sally Morris Consultant, Morris Associates (Publishing Consultancy) Email: sally@morris-assocs.demon.co.uk -----Original Message----- [mailto:owner-liblicense-l@lists.yale.edu] On Behalf Of Aaron Edlin Sent: 29 November 2007 00:51 To: liblicense-l@lists.yale.edu Subject: RE: NIH mandate - institutional repositories My own thinking, and the philosophy of bepress, is that the university is filled with many interests and constituencies. The puzzle is getting them to work well together. Faculty seek to promote themselves individually, and seek control and identity; universities seek to promote themselves and grow; librarians seek to create useful order from chaos. These goals can, but need not, conflict. As to mandates, I favor them. As I see it, the university or government funds much of my research. Why should they not demand and insist on a non-exclusive copy of my writings to preserve for posterity (for what posterity cares about my work) or to advertise to the world, should I be lucky enough that UC Berkeley could bask in the glory of my writing? All that said, for various political and practical reasons, including lobbying by Elsevier, I don't see *effective* mandates coming for a little while yet. In the meantime, the key for those who are pro-repository is to find a way to work with faculty. How do you make faculty volunteer or indeed be eager? Convince them that their career will benefit and give them control and something to identify with. Faculty want their own place...one they control... on the internet. Many build sites themselves with cumbersome and kludgy tools. These sites are highly idiosyncratic data structures. Better that they should be easy to use, beautiful, and easily harvestable (or automatically incorporated) into the institution's IR (or Research Showcase, as I like to call it). For this, bepress developed SelectedWorks (http://works.bepress.com). D-space has developed personal research pages. These, I predict, will be key to filling repositories until effective mandates arrive. ___ P.S. Please have a look at http://works.bepress.com/aaron_edlin/ and sign up for notifications of my new work!
- Prev by Date: RE: NIH mandate - institutional repositories
- Next by Date: Email "Call for Papers" (spam) does not come from Elsevier
- Previous by thread: RE: NIH mandate - institutional repositories
- Next by thread: RE: NIH mandate - institutional repositories
- Index(es):