[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

NIH mandate - institutional repositories

To: liblicense-l@lists.yale.edu
Subject: NIH mandate - institutional repositories
From: "Barbara Birenbaum" <bbirenbaum@ucla.edu>
Date: Tue, 20 Nov 2007 10:45:07 EST
Reply-to: liblicense-l@lists.yale.edu
Sender: owner-liblicense-l@lists.yale.edu

I am an MLIS student at UCLA.  I am currently working on a paper on
institutional repositories.  I understand from some of my readings
that the reality of the institutional repository has moved in another
direction from the concepts of both the OA model of access and the
SPARC model of encouraging alternative methods of scholarly
publication.  Will the NIH mandate, if it is signed into law, move the
institutional repository back to one or both of its prior purposes or
will those concepts remain just a part of the broader scope of the
present repositories?  I would really appreciate hearing the list
members' thoughts on this.



Barbara Birenbaum

Prev by Date: More on U. of Michigan Press controversy
Next by Date: Amazon's new Kindle e-book reader
Previous by thread: More on U. of Michigan Press controversy
Next by thread: Re: NIH mandate - institutional repositories
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread