[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: second-hand ownership
- To: liblicense-l@lists.yale.edu
- Subject: Re: second-hand ownership
- From: Kevin L Smith <kevin.l.smith@duke.edu>
- Date: Thu, 15 Nov 2007 17:43:40 EST
- Reply-to: liblicense-l@lists.yale.edu
- Sender: owner-liblicense-l@lists.yale.edu
I don't think there is enough information here to even begin to answer this question. I don't mean to be flippant, but it is not even certain what "Newton" we are talking about. Assuming it is Sir Isaac, who was a British subject and who died in 1727, there are many sets of circumstances in which there would be no copyright persisting in the work. But we would need to know if the work from which you took the material was published or unpublished and, if the former, when and where it was published. Another question is what you understood that you were paying for. It seems unlikely that you were actually paying a copyright permission fee; there may well be no copyright and, in most cases, libraries do not own the copyright even where it exists. You may have been paying a use fee or a fee to have a copy made. Such fees might not have to be paid again as long as you still have the facsimile you took away with you and could use it again in a subsequent article. If you were paying for copyright permission, however, that fee probably would have to be paid again for a different use, depending on the terms of the original license. I have a hard time imagining how the publisher of the first journal article could give or withhold permission for you to reuse this material. Even if you transferred your complete rights in the first article to the publisher, you can not transfer rights you do not hold. If the library owned a copyright to this material, which I think unlikely, your publication of the excerpt in an article, with permission, would not divest the owner of the rights to authorize subsequent uses. And if the work was not protected by copyright, publishing it in the first article would not give that publisher any right to control the public domain material; they could only control use of the original material for which copyright was transferred. I hope I haven't badly misunderstood the situation, but it is clear, at least, that more information is needed. Kevin L. Smith, J.D. Scholarly Communications Officer Perkins Library, Duke University PO Box 90193 Durham, NC 27708 919-668-4451 kevin.l.smith@duke.edu http://library.duke.edu/blogs/scholcomm/ "Ari Belenkiy" <belenka@mail.biu.ac.il> Sent by: owner-liblicense-l@lists.yale.edu 11/14/2007 10:32 PM To: <liblicense-l@lists.yale.edu> Subject: second-hand ownership Dear list members: I have a question on the ownership of "second-hand" artifacts. Recently I published a paper that displayed samples of Newton's handwriting from Jerusalem library. I paid for each of them in cash:) Now I want to publish another paper in another journal with parts of the same pages displayed again. Should I pay to the same library again (for virtually same pages)? Or should I negotiate the matter with the first journal to dismiss charges altogether? Or? Ari Belenkiy
- Prev by Date: Re: second-hand ownership
- Next by Date: RE: second-hand ownership
- Previous by thread: Re: second-hand ownership
- Next by thread: RE: second-hand ownership
- Index(es):