Re: NIH Public Access Mandate Passes Senate

[mheld@aap.org]

My take on this is that if bush makes a veto it will be to the 
whole thing slated on the appropriations bill unless they cut the 
requested amount from the budget.

Michael Held
Director, Division of Scholarly Journals ...
American Academy of Pediatrics
Sent from my Verizon Wireless BlackBerry

-----Original Message-----
From: Aline Soules <aline.soules@csueastbay.edu>
Date: Fri, 26 Oct 2007 18:54:32
To:liblicense-l@lists.yale.edu, liblicense-l@lists.yale.edu
Subject: RE: NIH Public Access Mandate Passes Senate

My understanding from ALA (I'm a legislative advocate for ACRL
and also the legnet rep for California) is that if the bill is
vetoed, it won't be related to the NIH issue, but to other
issues.

Aline Soules
Cal State East Bay
510-885-4596
aline.soules@csueastbay.edu

-----Original Message-----
From: owner-liblicense-l@lists.yale.edu on behalf of Rick Anderson
Sent: Thu 10/25/2007 6:48 PM
To: liblicense-l@lists.yale.edu
Subject: RE: NIH Public Access Mandate Passes Senate

This is certainly good news and I don't want to throw a wet
blanket on things -- but how likely is it that President Bush
would sign this bill into law, assuming it gets through both
houses with the requirement language intact?

---
Rick Anderson
Assoc. Dir. for Scholarly Resources & Collections
Marriott Library
University of Utah
rick.anderson@utah.edu