[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
RE: On metrics
- To: <liblicense-l@lists.yale.edu>
- Subject: RE: On metrics
- From: "Elizabeth R Lorbeer" <lorbeer@uab.edu>
- Date: Fri, 12 Oct 2007 19:10:11 EDT
- Reply-to: liblicense-l@lists.yale.edu
- Sender: owner-liblicense-l@lists.yale.edu
Jeff, Metric results are open to wide interpretation. Too often the focus is on quantity instead of quality of downloaded content. Numbers alone are no assurance that the content met the user's need, improved learning outcomes or increased research productivity. Liz Lorbeer University of Alabama at Birmingham -----Original Message----- From: owner-liblicense-l@lists.yale.edu [mailto:owner-liblicense-l@lists.yale.edu] On Behalf Of Wonsik "Jeff" Shim Sent: Thursday, October 11, 2007 4:02 PM To: liblicense-l@lists.yale.edu Subject: Re: On metrics Liz, although I agree with you that more detailed data would serve us better, please be aware that other groups of clientele exist with regard to usage metrics. Librarians is just one of several stakeholders--authors, university adminitrators, consortia managers, publishers and vendors to name a few --in the subscription contents. So you don't want to say no. of downloads is trivial. Librarians would need more detailed usage metrics to have a better understanding of user needs and demands. But other groups will focus on more macro level data and no. of downloads is one such data. I personally think that if other decision makers within the parent organization believes that downloads are important, librarians should look at the numbers more closely, understand their trends better. I also think that downloads, even at the aggregate level, tell us something about user demands and preferences in the absence of direct measure for such. Inclusion of no. of downloads as a core element in standard usage metrics such as COUNTER needs to be maintained for the time being. -Jeff Shim Dept. of Library and Information Science Sungkyunkwan University Seoul, Korea On 10/11/07, Elizabeth R Lorbeer <lorbeer@uab.edu> wrote: > The number of downloads is a trivial metric since all it reveals > is that an attempt was made to access an article at the journal's > web site. More useful metrics include machine specific IP of the > requestor, volume specific usage, and average length of time > viewing an article. > > Liz Lorbeer > University of Alabama at Birmingham > lorbeer@uab.edu
- Prev by Date: Collection Management Librarian, James Madison University
- Next by Date: Emerald Digitizing its Backfiles
- Previous by thread: RE: On metrics
- Next by thread: On metrics
- Index(es):