[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Acquisition of E-Book Packages From Large Vendors
- To: <liblicense-l@lists.yale.edu>
- Subject: Acquisition of E-Book Packages From Large Vendors
- From: "Karen Tschanz" <KTSCHANZ@mail.mcg.edu>
- Date: Tue, 9 Oct 2007 20:12:41 EDT
- Reply-to: liblicense-l@lists.yale.edu
- Sender: owner-liblicense-l@lists.yale.edu
Dear "Listers": In the course of reviewing health sciences e-book packages, we have established that our first cut rubric for analyzing content (creating a surrogate collection made up of select titles from Brandon Hill and Doody) is not particularly useful for looking at large packages of research level content made available by major publishers. We would like to know more about how others, especially health sciences libraries, may be approaching this kind of content analysis. Thanks in advance for your advice and suggestions! kst
- Prev by Date: The Condor Migrates to UC Press
- Next by Date: Re: UC Berkeley classes on YouTube
- Previous by thread: The Condor Migrates to UC Press
- Next by thread: NISO Usage Data Forum -- Early Bird Registration
- Index(es):