[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: Question on Galileo without Elsevier
- To: <liblicense-l@lists.yale.edu>
- Subject: Re: Question on Galileo without Elsevier
- From: "Joseph J. Esposito" <espositoj@gmail.com>
- Date: Mon, 1 Oct 2007 19:52:07 EDT
- Reply-to: liblicense-l@lists.yale.edu
- Sender: owner-liblicense-l@lists.yale.edu
Richard,
I may simply be obtuse here, but I would like very much to understand your parable better. Can you spell out its implications?
Joe Esposito
----- Original Message -----
From: "Richard Feinman" <RFeinman@downstate.edu>
To: <liblicense-l@lists.yale.edu>
Sent: Friday, September 28, 2007 3:07 PM
Subject: Question on Galileo without Elsevier
If turned down by a scholarly journal, would Galileo have had any legal recourse to get a paper published? If his lawyer could demonstrate that the scientific standards of his work were commensurate in quality with other papers published in a particular journal, could he argue that only pressure from the church or even sincere opposition because of contradiction of church doctrine, was keeping him from being published? Does anybody know if there is any legal recourse for a privately owned journal? Does a journal's editor have a completely free hand? Richard D. Feinman, Co-editor-in-chief (718) 871-1374 FAX: (718) 270-3316
- Next by Date: Re: Question on Galileo without Elsevier
- Next by thread: Re: Question on Galileo without Elsevier
- Index(es):