[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
More Reasons for the Immediate Deposit Mandate and the Eprint Request Button
- To: AMERICAN-SCIENTIST-OPEN-ACCESS-FORUM@LISTSERVER.SIGMAXI.ORG
- Subject: More Reasons for the Immediate Deposit Mandate and the Eprint Request Button
- From: Stevan Harnad <harnad@ecs.soton.ac.uk>
- Date: Mon, 17 Sep 2007 19:15:14 EDT
- Reply-to: liblicense-l@lists.yale.edu
- Sender: owner-liblicense-l@lists.yale.edu
** Cross-Posted **
For hyperlinked references, see:
http://openaccess.eprints.org/index.php?/archives/292-guid.html
The paper reprint request era's prime innovator, Eugene Garfield, had
already anticipated many of the current developments in Open Access:
(1) Garfield, E. (1999) From Photostats to Home Pages on the
World Wide Web: A Tutorial on How to Create Your Electronic
Archive. The Scientist 13(4):14.
EXCERPT: It is the utopian expectation of those who live
in cyberspace that eventually most researchers will create
Web sites containing the full text of all their papers... The
social, economic, and scholarly impact of this development has
major consequences for the future.
Garfield, E. (1965) Is the 'free reprint system' free and/or
obsolete? Essays of an Information Scientist 1:10-11.
Garfield, E. (1972) Reprint Exchange. 1. The multimillion
dollar problem ordinaire, Essays of an Information Scientist
1:359-60.
(2) Drenth, JPH (2003) More reprint requests, more citations?
Scientometrics 56: 283-286.
ABSTRACT: Reprint requests are commonly used to obtain a copy of
an article. This study aims to correlate the number of reprint
requests from a 10-year-sample of articles with the number of
citations. The database contained 28 articles published in over
a 10-year-period (1992-2001). For each separate article the
number of citations and and the number of reprint requests were
retrieved. In total 303 reprint requests were analysed. Reviews
(median 9, range 1 to 95) and original articles (median 8, range
1-36) attracted most reprint requests. There was an excellent
correlation between the number of requests and citations to
article (two-tailed non-parametric Spearman rank test r = 0.55;
95% confidence interval 0.18-0.78, P < 0.005). Articles that
received most reprint requests are cited more often.
(3) Swales, J. (1988), Language and scientific communication. The
case of the reprint request. Scientometrics 13: 93-101.
EXCERPT: This paper reports on a study of Reprint Requests
(RRs). It is estimated that tens of millions of RRs are mailed
each year, most being triggered by Current Contents...
------------------------------------------------------------------
In the online era, the days of reprint requests ought to be over,
with Open Access taking their place. But some research funders and
universities are still hesitating about mandating Open Access
Self-Archiving, because they are concerned about publishers'
embargoes. Here is the solution:
Even where a publisher embargoes or does not endorse OA
self-archiving, universities and research funders can and
should still go ahead and mandate immediate deposit anyway,
with no exceptions or delays, but allowing the deposit to be made
Closed Access instead of Open Access during any publisher-
imposed embargo period.
The Institutional Repository's semi-automatized Email Eprint Request Button will provide almost-immediate, almost-OA to tide over all researcher usage needs webwide till the end of the embargo (or till embargoes die their natural and well-deserved deaths, under the growing pressure and increasingly apparent benefits of OA).
Stevan Harnad
- Prev by Date: RE: AAAS and JSTOR issues
- Next by Date: deadline extended for regional ARL/ACRL Institute on Scholarly Communication
- Previous by thread: Duke University Press launches the Carlyle Letters Online
- Next by thread: deadline extended for regional ARL/ACRL Institute on Scholarly Communication
- Index(es):