[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: Fair-Use/Schmair-Use...
- To: liblicense-l@lists.yale.edu
- Subject: Re: Fair-Use/Schmair-Use...
- From: Stevan Harnad <harnad@ecs.soton.ac.uk>
- Date: Sun, 5 Aug 2007 05:15:44 EDT
- Reply-to: liblicense-l@lists.yale.edu
- Sender: owner-liblicense-l@lists.yale.edu
On Sat, 4 Aug 2007, Sandy Thatcher wrote: > You obviously have disdain for legal terminology and copyright law. But law, > like science, depends upon careful use of technical terms. Would you sanction > casual use of technical terms from science that could create confusion in the > public mind? No, Sandy, in science I would not; but in the case of these legal terms and concepts -- applied to a new medium that lawyers neither understand, nor one to which their obsolescent terms and concepts are even coherently applicable -- it is the "technical terms" that are the confused ones, and what is needed is some common sense in their stead, to dispel the confusion they create in the public mind. Chrs, Stevan
- Prev by Date: RE: Homer Simpson at the NIH
- Next by Date: liblicense-l: brief interlude
- Previous by thread: Re: Fair-Use/Schmair-Use...
- Next by thread: Re: Fair-Use/Schmair-Use...
- Index(es):