[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
RE: Funding threshold (RE: LA Times editorial on accessing NIH research)
- To: <liblicense-l@lists.yale.edu>, "Rick Anderson" <rickand@unr.edu>
- Subject: RE: Funding threshold (RE: LA Times editorial on accessing NIH research)
- From: "William Walsh" <libwdw@langate.gsu.edu>
- Date: Thu, 2 Aug 2007 15:28:55 EDT
- Reply-to: liblicense-l@lists.yale.edu
- Sender: owner-liblicense-l@lists.yale.edu
The current policy states: "NIH anticipates that investigators, or their designees, will submit an electronic version of the author's final manuscript upon acceptance for publication, resulting from research supported, in whole or in part, with direct costs from NIH. " http://publicaccess.nih.gov/publicaccess_manual.htm So I think your strict reading of the text is correct. William Walsh Head, Acquisitions Department Georgia State University Library Atlanta, GA 30303 Email: wwalsh@gsu.edu >>> On 8/1/2007 at 2:46 PM, "Rick Anderson" <rickand@unr.edu> wrote: > Right. So I guess the answer to my question is "no" -- the > proposal does not specify a threshold funding level. A strict > reading of this measure would lead one to expect, then, that > any support at all from NIH would trigger the OA requirement -- > even if NIH funds were a very small part of the total funding > package for a given piece of research. > > Do others read it differently? > > --- > Rick Anderson > Dir. of Resource Acquisition > University of Nevada, Reno Libraries > (775) 682-5664 > rickand@unr.edu
- Prev by Date: RE: Homer Simpson at the NIH
- Next by Date: August issue of the SPARC Open Access Newsletter
- Previous by thread: Funding threshold (RE: LA Times editorial on accessing NIH research)
- Next by thread: RE: Funding threshold (RE: LA Times editorial on accessing NIH research)
- Index(es):