[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
RE: OA-journals alive or??
- To: <liblicense-l@lists.yale.edu>
- Subject: RE: OA-journals alive or??
- From: "David Prosser" <david.prosser@bodley.ox.ac.uk>
- Date: Fri, 13 Jul 2007 15:39:35 EDT
- Reply-to: liblicense-l@lists.yale.edu
- Sender: owner-liblicense-l@lists.yale.edu
Sally I've quickly looked at Ulrich's: selecting 'refereed' and 'academic/scholarly' gives us 25,700 titles. Selecting 'refereed', 'academic/scholarly', and 'ceased' gives us 1,660 titles. So, it would appear that 6.4% of journals listed by Ulrich's are not active. These things are all relative, of course, but 7.5% for the DOAJ does not appear particularly large compared with 6.4%. Interestingly, Ulrich's underestimates the number of ceased open access journals - of a total of 1,668 listed only 15 are 'ceased', giving 0.9%. This does show that the 6.4% figure above is mainly subscription journals. David C Prosser PhD Director SPARC Europe E-mail: david.prosser@bodley.ox.ac.uk -----Original Message----- [mailto:owner-liblicense-l@lists.yale.edu] On Behalf Of Sally Morris (Morris Associates) Sent: 12 July 2007 23:36 To: liblicense-l@lists.yale.edu Subject: RE: OA-journals alive or?? So, about 7.5% are inactive (or otherwise ineligible) It seems to me that's quite high Sally Morris Email: sally@morris-assocs.demon.co.uk -----Original Message----- From: owner-liblicense-l@lists.yale.edu [mailto:owner-liblicense-l@lists.yale.edu] On Behalf Of Lars Bjornshauge Sent: 12 July 2007 00:42 To: liblicense-l@lists.yale.edu Subject: OA-journals alive or?? Hi, As to the current discussion whether the OA-journals are truly alive and well I can inform you, that the DOAJ-team is currently reviewing the DOAJ journals as to whether the journals still comply with the criteria, including whether they are active. Since the frequency of publication varies enormously - just as it is the case with journals in general - it is not an easy task to determine if a journal has ceased publication. In the review as a default the publisher is contacted if a journal has not published any issues during the last 18 months, the same is the case if the DOAJ team observes major irregularities in current publication frequency compared to earlier publication frequency. The review has as of today been performed for around 50% of the journals. Due to the support from the community via the DOAJ Membership Program - http://www.doaj.org/doaj?func=membership - we have recently added staff especially in order to speed up the reviewing process. To date the DOAJ team has removed approx. 100 titles from DOAJ due to lack of compliance with the criteria: http://www.doaj.org/doaj?func=loadTempl&templ=faq#selectioncriteria Please note that removal can be caused by lack of compliance with any of the criteria. Regards Lars Bjornshauge Director of Libraries Lund University www.lub.lu.se www.doaj.org jinfo.lub.lu.se
- Prev by Date: Re: Correction (RE: Thatcher vs. Harnad)
- Next by Date: RE: Correction (RE: Thatcher vs. Harnad)
- Previous by thread: RE: OA-journals alive or??
- Next by thread: RE: OA-journals alive or??
- Index(es):