[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: potential positive spiral in transition to open access
- To: liblicense-l@lists.yale.edu
- Subject: Re: potential positive spiral in transition to open access
- From: "Greg Tananbaum" <gtananbaum@gmail.com>
- Date: Tue, 10 Jul 2007 15:57:14 EDT
- Reply-to: liblicense-l@lists.yale.edu
- Sender: owner-liblicense-l@lists.yale.edu
Is it possible that the key to determining the likelihood of success or failure for a given publication is not so much its business model (OA vs. non-OA), but rather the extent to which the publication has some form of institutional support? By institutional support, I refer to the imprimatur of a commercial publisher, a university press, a learned society, or even a less formal publishing body such as a department? Journals that are sponsored by an entity that has some reputation to protect seem much more likely to avoid the cruel fate Sally and others have described. These entities also presumably have some infrastructure to sustain the loss of a single editor or IT whiz that might cripple an autonomous publication. If my (perhaps seemingly obvious) hypothesis is correct, a more productive research project would involve an investigation of dead and dormant journals to determine their level of institutional support. Best, Greg _______________________ Greg Tananbaum gtananbaum@gmail.com (510) 295-7504 CONSULTING SERVICES AT THE INTERSECTION OF TECHNOLOGY, CONTENT, & ACADEMIA
- Prev by Date: Re: Maximising research access vs. minimizing copy-editing errors
- Next by Date: RE: Euromonitor license
- Previous by thread: RE: potential positive spiral in transition to open access
- Next by thread: RE: potential positive spiral in transition to open access
- Index(es):