[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
RE: Correction (RE: Thatcher vs. Harnad)
- To: <liblicense-l@lists.yale.edu>
- Subject: RE: Correction (RE: Thatcher vs. Harnad)
- From: "Rick Anderson" <rickand@unr.edu>
- Date: Thu, 28 Jun 2007 22:26:24 EDT
- Reply-to: liblicense-l@lists.yale.edu
- Sender: owner-liblicense-l@lists.yale.edu
> Except, of course, where there are no author fees (in the case > of over half of the journals listed in the DOAJ), or where the > authors fees can be waived (BMC, PLoS, etc.). In cases where no author fees exist, you're certainly right. In cases where author fees exist but "can be" waived, then the barrier is the process of getting the author fee waived so that one may publish. (In most cases, I'd imagine that that's a fairly low barrier.) > (Incidentally, I always find it intriguing that open access > publication fees are described as barriers to publication, but > we rarely hear the same being said of page charges, colour > figure charges, etc. for publication-based journals.) It's probably said rarely because the point is so obvious. Any time you make an author pay money to submit content for publication, you're putting barriers in her way. --- Rick Anderson Dir. of Resource Acquisition University of Nevada, Reno Libraries rickand@unr.edu
- Prev by Date: Re: Publish-or-Perish Mandates and Self-Archiving Mandates
- Next by Date: RE: potential positive spiral in transition to open access
- Previous by thread: RE: Correction (RE: Thatcher vs. Harnad)
- Next by thread: Re: Correction (RE: Thatcher vs. Harnad)
- Index(es):