[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
RE: Publish-or-Perish Mandates and Self-Archiving Mandates
- To: <liblicense-l@lists.yale.edu>
- Subject: RE: Publish-or-Perish Mandates and Self-Archiving Mandates
- From: "Rick Anderson" <rickand@unr.edu>
- Date: Fri, 22 Jun 2007 17:35:05 EDT
- Reply-to: liblicense-l@lists.yale.edu
- Sender: owner-liblicense-l@lists.yale.edu
> But if "compulsion" is indeed the right word for mandating > self-archiving, I wonder whether Sally was ever curious about > why publication itself had to be mandated by researchers' > institutions and funders ("publish or perish"), despite its > substantial benefits to researchers? "Compulsion" is probably not the right word for the expectation that a professor do the job he is being paid for: producing and disseminating research. It most certainly is the right word for a legal requirement that the work be disseminated in one particular way. We can argue about whether legally-mandated OA is a good thing or a bad thing, but there is no intellectually serious way to argue that legal mandates don't constitute compulsion. --- Rick Anderson Dir. of Resource Acquisition University of Nevada, Reno Libraries rickand@unr.edu
- Prev by Date: SERU 0.9 Draft Available for Pilot Use
- Next by Date: Job posting: Emory University E-Resources Librarian
- Previous by thread: Publish-or-Perish Mandates and Self-Archiving Mandates
- Next by thread: Re: Publish-or-Perish Mandates and Self-Archiving Mandates
- Index(es):