[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: Fair use/fair dealing - a fantasy?: qusetion
- To: liblicense-l@lists.yale.edu
- Subject: Re: Fair use/fair dealing - a fantasy?: qusetion
- From: ml1047@columbia.edu
- Date: Wed, 13 Jun 2007 16:54:56 EDT
- Reply-to: liblicense-l@lists.yale.edu
- Sender: owner-liblicense-l@lists.yale.edu
Quoting "Copycense (K. Matthew Dames)" <copycense@gmail.com>: >Therefore, my understanding of the issue echoes that made by a >prior contributor to this thread: the general rule is that once >a contract is in place, the terms and conditions of the contract >prevail over federal copyright law because a contract is >considered to be a private bargain between private actors (whom >are presumed to have equal bargaining power to negotiate the >terms and conditions of the contract). I am assuming, of course, >that the contract is valid under applicable state law. In relation to the intersection of state/federal law presented here, would authors/users in US enjoy greater flexibility with respect to practices described in these threads as "fair use" when the journals's transfer agreement falls under the jurisdiction of another country? Michael Luby
- Prev by Date: RFP: Innovative uses of CrossRef Metadata
- Next by Date: ESC's Cardiovascular Research announces new partnership with Oxford Journals
- Previous by thread: RFP: Innovative uses of CrossRef Metadata
- Next by thread: RE: Fair use/fair dealing - a fantasy?: qusetion
- Index(es):