[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: Self-Archiving and Journal Subscriptions: Critique of PRC
- To: liblicense-l@lists.yale.edu
- Subject: Re: Self-Archiving and Journal Subscriptions: Critique of PRC
- From: "atanu garai" <atanugarai.lists@gmail.com>
- Date: Tue, 22 May 2007 12:31:17 EDT
- Reply-to: liblicense-l@lists.yale.edu
- Sender: owner-liblicense-l@lists.yale.edu
I was looking for a data on the cumulative expenditure on author-payee open access compared to the subscription based access model. Here is a quote from an article by John Enderby: Researchers in the UK, for example, produce about 75,000 papers a year, which means they would have to pay about L100m in author fees if all journals were open access. This sum is far higher than the L90m they currently pay in library subscriptions. (The open-access debate. http://physicsweb.org/articles/world/20/1/4/1) Atanu Garai Globethics.net
- Prev by Date: RE: Self-Archiving and Journal Subscriptions: Critique of PRC
- Next by Date: RE: Self-Archiving and Journal Subscriptions: Critique of PRC
- Previous by thread: RE: Self-Archiving and Journal Subscriptions: Critique of PRC
- Next by thread: RE: Self-Archiving and Journal Subscriptions: Critique of PRC
- Index(es):