[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
RE: Self-Archiving and Journal Subscriptions: Critique of PRC Study
- To: <liblicense-l@lists.yale.edu>
- Subject: RE: Self-Archiving and Journal Subscriptions: Critique of PRC Study
- From: "Rick Anderson" <rickand@unr.edu>
- Date: Sun, 20 May 2007 19:36:55 EDT
- Reply-to: liblicense-l@lists.yale.edu
- Sender: owner-liblicense-l@lists.yale.edu
> As a result, no one can make a general, sweepingg, statement > that gold OA would remove money from research. It all depends > on how the money is parcelled out. Gold OA will remove money from research to the exact degree that it causes funding to be redirected from the support of research to the support of publication and distribution. A dollar can either support a dollar's worth of the former or a dollar's worth of the latter -- no matter how you parcel it out, it's still only a dollar. And: > Why would the author have to fund OA publishing? Why wouldn't > the library or the University fund the publishing? An "author-funded" model doesn't actually assume that, in most cases, the author will pay out of her own pocket. The assumption is that the author will usually get the money from someplace else, either from a granting agency or from her institution. The question -- and it's a difficult one -- is whether such an arrangement would result in a net gain or a net loss in benefit to the scholarly community and the world at large. --- Rick Anderson Dir. of Resource Acquisition Univ. of Nevada, Reno Libraries rickand@unr.edu
- Prev by Date: ALA Program announcement
- Next by Date: Re: Self-Archiving and Journal Subscriptions: Critique of PRC Stud=
- Previous by thread: RE: Self-Archiving and Journal Subscriptions: Critique of PRC Study
- Next by thread: Re: Self-Archiving and Journal Subscriptions: Critique of PRC Study
- Index(es):