[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
RE: Self-Archiving and Journal Subscriptions: Critique of PRC Study
- To: liblicense-l@lists.yale.edu, liblicense-l@lists.yale.edu
- Subject: RE: Self-Archiving and Journal Subscriptions: Critique of PRC Study
- From: "Velterop, Jan, Springer UK" <Jan.Velterop@springer.com>
- Date: Thu, 17 May 2007 18:27:48 EDT
- Reply-to: liblicense-l@lists.yale.edu
- Sender: owner-liblicense-l@lists.yale.edu
I'm still puzzled. The library budget money come from where? Possibly from the same sources as grant money? Possibly from 'overheads' taken off grants by the institutions? Isn't it time for some joined-up approach? Jan Velterop -----Original Message----- From: owner-liblicense-l@lists.yale.edu on behalf of Rick Anderson Sent: Wed 5/16/2007 11:40 PM To: liblicense-l@lists.yale.edu Subject: RE: Self-Archiving and Journal Subscriptions: Critique of PRC Study > While I can agree with much of what Rick Anderson says here, > his last sentence is puzzling. As one of the serious problems > of Gold OA he quotes "the significant amount of money that a > widespread Gold OA solution would redirect from needed > research." > > How so? Why would publishing become more expensive when the way > to sustain it changes? If one thinks that Gold OA would > redirect a significant amount of money away from needed > research, what about subscriptions? Don't subscriptions do the > same? Doesn't any money that sustains journals? The money that currently supports commercial journals comes from library budgets and from individual subscribers, not from granting agencies. If all of the expensive journals to which my library subscribes were suddenly to move to an author-funded OA publishing model (and therefore become freely available to the public), the most likely scenario is that my institution would (quite rationally) drastically cut the library budget. The savings would be redirected to other areas of the university where they are sorely needed, and authors would write their publication costs into their grant proposals. Money from granting agencies that would have supported research will thereby end up subsidizing free public access to the research results. Is that a good thing or a bad thing? It depends: will the general public benefit more from universal free access to a smaller amount of research or from toll-based access to more research? The answer may vary -- but there's no way that redirecting research funds towards publication can fail to reduce the amount of research done. --- Rick Anderson Dir. of Resource Acquisition University of Nevada, Reno Libraries rickand@unr.edu
- Prev by Date: Recent research tempers citation advantage of open access
- Next by Date: RE: Self-Archiving and Journal Subscriptions: Critique of PRC Stud=
- Previous by thread: Re: Self-Archiving and Journal Subscriptions: Critique of PRC Study
- Next by thread: Re: Self-Archiving and Journal Subscriptions: Critique of PRC Study
- Index(es):