[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
RE: Scholarly Publishing Groups Issue White Paper on
- To: <liblicense-l@lists.yale.edu>
- Subject: RE: Scholarly Publishing Groups Issue White Paper on Academic Use of Journal Articles
- From: "Armbruster, Chris" <Chris.Armbruster@EUI.eu>
- Date: Thu, 10 May 2007 17:54:35 -0400 (EDT)
"Exclusive rights are critical to administering the scientific record and ensuring viable business models for journals." http://www.pspcentral.org/ (scroll down) With the White Paper "Author and Publishing Rights for Academic Use: An Appropriate Balance", publishers are preparing legal and policy moves to limit the sharing of published research articles and data to the author"s institution, seemingly seeking to end archiving and distribution of any post-print (by author, library or institutional repository). Publishers are speaking of the need to limit sharing to "internal institutional non-commercial research and education purposes." By contrast, in a recent paper I argue that nonexclusive licensing is the way forward in the dissemination and certification of research articles and data. The paper was announced Winner: Writing Competition Yale Law Information Society Project "Access to Knowledge" (2007) and International Journal of Communications Law and Policy (IJCLP) http://research.yale.edu/isp/eventsa2k2.html "Cyberscience and the Knowledge-based Economy, Open Access and Trade Publishing: From Contradiction to Compatibility with Nonexclusive Copyright Licensing" No change in copyright law is required. Universities, libraries, research funders and scholars may implement all necessary regulation for the emergence of a competitive market that will ensure open access, maximise global inclusion and enhance impact. All that is required are copyright policies that regulate for nonexclusive licensing with some rights reserved (Attribution and No Derivative Works). The paper provides a full exposition of the argument (see abstract below). Abstract Open source, open content and open access are set to fundamentally alter the conditions of knowledge production and distribution. Open source, open content and open access are also the most tangible result of the shift towards e-Science and digital networking. Yet, this article takes issue with widespread misperceptions about the nature of this shift. The focus is on knowledge distribution and scholarly publishing. It is argued, on the one hand, that for the academy there principally is no digital dilemma surrounding copyright and there is no contradiction between open science and the knowledge-based economy if profits are made from nonexclusive rights. On the other hand, pressure for the "digital doubling" of research articles in OA repositories (so-called green road) is misguided and OA publishing (so-called gold road) has no future outside biomedicine. Commercial publishers must understand that business models based on the transfer of copyright have no future either. Digital technology and its economics favour the severance of distribution from certification. What is required of universities and governments, scholars and publishers, is to clear the way for digital innovations in knowledge distribution and scholarly publishing by enabling the emergence of a competitive market that is based on nonexclusive rights. This requires no change in the law but merely an end to the praxis of copyright transfer and exclusive licensing. The best way forward is the adoption of standard copyright licenses that reserve some rights, namely Attribution and No Derivative Works, but otherwise will allow for the unlimited reproduction, dissemination and use of the research article, commercial uses included. I would like to thank Theresa Velden for helping my to clarify the structure of the argument. Paul Ginsparg (ArXiv), Thomas Krichel (RePEc) and Gregg Gordon (SSRN) I thank for helping me think through the issue of "first copy cost" for digital guild publishing. The Fondazione Anonio Ruberti (Roma, Italia) with EIROforum (European Organisation for Nuclear Research (CERN); European Fusion Development Agreement (EFDA); European Molecular Biology Laboratory (EMBL); European Space Agency (ESA); European Southern Observatory (ESO); European Synchrotron Radiation Facility (ESRF); Institut Laue-Langevin (ILL) provided the scholarship that made the research possible. It was undertaken as a Visiting Fellow at the Robert Schuman Centre for Advanced Studies. Chris Armbruster Research Network 1989 Founder and Executive Director http://www.cee-socialscience.net/1989/ -----Original Message----- From: owner-liblicense-l@lists.yale.edu on behalf of Janice Kuta Sent: Wed 5/9/2007 5:27 AM To: liblicense-l@lists.yale.edu Subject: Scholarly Publishing Groups Issue White Paper on Academic Use of Journal Content FOR RELEASE 9 MAY 2007 Scholarly Publishing Groups Issue White Paper on Academic Use of Journal Content Three prestigious organizations representing the international scholarly publishing community today issued a White Paper on the academic use of journal content. The position paper was issued by the International Association of Scientific, Technical and Medical Publishers (STM), the Professional and Scholarly Publishing Division of the Association of American Publishers (AAP/PSP) and the Association of Learned and Professional Society Publishers (ALPSP) in an effort to create a more balanced understanding of the actual rights policies in place at most journals, and in the hope of tempering the often overheated rhetoric regarding the role of copyright in scholarly communication. <snip>
- Prev by Date: Registration - 28th IATUL Annual Conference
- Next by Date: Re: Russia and Turkey Register Green OA Self-Archiving
- Previous by thread: Registration - 28th IATUL Annual Conference
- Next by thread: RE: Scholarly Publishing Groups Issue White Paper on
- Index(es):