[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
RE: Russia and Turkey Register Green OA Self-Archiving Mandates in ROARMAP
- To: <liblicense-l@lists.yale.edu>
- Subject: RE: Russia and Turkey Register Green OA Self-Archiving Mandates in ROARMAP
- From: "Rick Anderson" <rickand@unr.edu>
- Date: Thu, 10 May 2007 17:12:45 EDT
- Reply-to: liblicense-l@lists.yale.edu
- Sender: owner-liblicense-l@lists.yale.edu
> I don't see any reason for embargos for posting accepted articles > on institutional repositories. But there's the problem -- accepted by whom? A journal? The problem with immediately making the accepted version freely available to the public is that doing so tends to undermine the ability of a journal to sell access to it. On a superficial level this may sound like a good thing (free being usually preferable to costly), but look deeper and you find problems -- notably, the fact that journal revenue often supports societies who support research and other scholarly activities. Undermine the ability of societies to sell content, and you undermine their ability to do anything else. Is the trade-off ever worth it? Probably. But not always. (This is the problem with legal mandates, which would make it impossible to discriminate between situations where the trade-off is worth it and where it isn't.) --- Rick Anderson Dir. of Resource Acquisition University of Nevada, Reno Libraries (775) 682-5664 rickand@unr.edu
- Prev by Date: RE: Russia and Turkey Register Green OA Self-Archiving Mandates in= ROARMAP
- Next by Date: Re: News Release: Project Transfer
- Previous by thread: RE: Russia and Turkey Register Green OA Self-Archiving Mandates in ROARMAP
- Next by thread: Salem Press, Inc. Selects Atypon Systems, Inc. to Develop Delivery Platform for Online Reference Works
- Index(es):