[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
RE: Clarification on SERU proposal
- To: <liblicense-l@lists.yale.edu>
- Subject: RE: Clarification on SERU proposal
- From: <Toby.GREEN@oecd.org>
- Date: Wed, 25 Apr 2007 21:26:22 EDT
- Reply-to: liblicense-l@lists.yale.edu
- Sender: owner-liblicense-l@lists.yale.edu
I've never heard of anyone getting involved in legal proceedings, nor cutting off access. Our position is the same as Chicago's: we post some terms and conditions on our site, click-through is not required, we only negotiate licenses when our clients request one. Toby Green Head of Publishing OECD Publishing Public Affairs and Communications Directorate http://www.oecd.org/Bookshop http://www.SourceOECD.org - our award-winning e-library http://www.oecd.org/OECDdirect - our new title alerting service -----Original Message----- From: owner-liblicense-l@lists.yale.edu [mailto:owner-liblicense-l@lists.yale.edu] On Behalf Of Sally Morris (Morris Associates) Sent: 25 April, 2007 1:45 AM To: liblicense-l@lists.yale.edu Subject: RE: Clarification on SERU proposal I'd love to know if anyone on this list, whether publisher or librarian, has ever been involved in legal proceedings because of infringement of an e-journal licence? The publisher always has the 'ultimate sanction' of cutting off access - indeed, how many of you have even encountered this? Consultant, Morris Associates (Publishing Consultancy) Email: sally@morris-assocs.demon.co.uk
- Prev by Date: RE: The Value of OA (resend)
- Next by Date: RE: Summary paper from the Publishing Research Consortium
- Previous by thread: RE: Clarification on SERU proposal
- Next by thread: RE: Clarification on SERU proposal
- Index(es):