[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: OA - What cost? What value?
- To: <liblicense-l@lists.yale.edu>
- Subject: Re: OA - What cost? What value?
- From: Peter Banks <pbanks@bankspub.com>
- Date: Sun, 15 Apr 2007 15:50:10 EDT
- Reply-to: liblicense-l@lists.yale.edu
- Sender: owner-liblicense-l@lists.yale.edu
This formulation calls to mind Jakes Barnes' final line in The Sun Also Rises: "Isn't it pretty to think so?." When in the history of any human enterprise (at least after the discovery of simple machines) has a "negligible" investment produced "double" the output? Let's say "negligible" is 0.05 in whatever arbitrary units you choose--dollars, say. A 40-fold increase in impact? Common sense tells us otherwise. So do the data that exist. Peter Banks Banks Publishing Publications Consulting and Services pbanks@bankspub.com www.bankspub.com www.associationpublisher.com/blog/ On 4/13/07 9:53 PM, "Stevan Harnad" <harnad@ecs.soton.ac.uk> wrote: > Green OA: > > Cost: Negligible > Value: Doubles research impact > How: Mandate Green OA > When: Now > > (Then, afterward, go back to debating and speculating about the > future of publishing and the Green, Gold and Other options; not > now; not instead; not while Green OA is already fully within > reach and there is nothing to lose and everything to gain -- a > and time is passing and passing and... ) > > P.S. OA is not about publishing costs, it's about research access > and impact loss, needlessly continuing day upon week upon month > upon year, year in and year out, as we just keep on rehashing the > same old hypothetical conditionals instead of doing the obvious, > practical, doable, and grotesquely overdue...
- Prev by Date: Re: The Value of OA (resend)
- Next by Date: Depot, a central service for UK's Institutional Repositories: round-up, back-up and stop-gap
- Previous by thread: Re: OA - What cost? What value?
- Next by thread: Researchers' use of libraries study report published
- Index(es):