[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
RE: Is it time to stop printing journals?
- To: <liblicense-l@lists.yale.edu>
- Subject: RE: Is it time to stop printing journals?
- From: "Rick Anderson" <rickand@unr.edu>
- Date: Sat, 7 Apr 2007 08:59:16 EDT
- Reply-to: liblicense-l@lists.yale.edu
- Sender: owner-liblicense-l@lists.yale.edu
> From our early work on the Portico archive we have seen that > libraries from across the spectrum (and around the world) are > willing to contribute to support of a community-based permanent > archive. This response suggests that libraries - large and > small - believe that action to ensure permanent access to the > scholarly record is just as vital to the teaching and education > mission of their parent institutions as is the provision of > current access to a breadth of materials. Absolutely. But it also demonstrates these libraries' recognition that they may not be the ones who can (or even ought to) provide that permanence of access. Initiatives like Portico allow libraries to offload some of their archival functions so that they can focus scarce resources on other aspects of their mission. I think this kind of specialization is probably the wave of the future: most libraries will become more focused on providing breadth rather than permanence, and specialized services (Portico, JSTOR, etc.) will continue to develop specialized archival functions to make that possible. --- Rick Anderson Dir. of Resource Acquisition University of Nevada, Reno Libraries rickand@unr.edu
- Prev by Date: RE: The Value of OA
- Next by Date: Re: Is it time to stop printing journals?
- Previous by thread: Is it time to stop printing journals?
- Next by thread: Re: Is it time to stop printing journals?
- Index(es):