[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
RE: Is it time to stop printing journals?
- To: <liblicense-l@lists.yale.edu>
- Subject: RE: Is it time to stop printing journals?
- From: "Margaret Landesman" <margaret.landesman@utah.edu>
- Date: Sat, 31 Mar 2007 15:17:47 EDT
- Reply-to: liblicense-l@lists.yale.edu
- Sender: owner-liblicense-l@lists.yale.edu
Greg, Yes. AND, one of the (older) history professors asked me the other day if we couldn't have all the Cambridge books - or at least the reference-y ones - online - as we do with Oxford. I said, "What about the print?" he said, "For the online, we'll be happy to do without them." Margaret Landesman Utah PS Our Approval Profile for Oxford now specifies that instead of Blackwell automatically sending us a book, they should just notify us - send a electronic 'notification slip' - since we are buying many Oxford titles online, we are buying less print. -----Original Message----- [mailto:owner-liblicense-l@lists.yale.edu] On Behalf Of Greg Tananbaum Sent: Thursday, March 29, 2007 5:50 PM To: liblicense-l@lists.yale.edu Subject: Re: Is it time to stop printing journals? Scott Plutchak from UAB writes in his blog response: "We certainly don't need to keep the print to satisfy our user base. Two years ago we stopped getting any print for our ScienceDirect titles. I did not get a single question, comment, or expression of concern from faculty or students. We've reached the point where librarians tend to worry a lot more about the print than the people who use our libraries do." I am curious to hear whether this is a commonly held sentiment. In other words, do the librarians on this list have the sense that their patrons are operating in a post-print world (not in the OA/PMC/Battle Royale sense of the term, but meaning have we outgrown print)? If so, this would be a remarkable shift, and a remarkably quick one. Certainly when I helped launch The Berkeley Electronic Press in 2000, print was sacrosanct. The idea of a viable electronic-only journal publisher was met with feedback running the wide gamut from skepticism to scorn. If this equation has indeed flipped in a matter of a half-dozen or so years, this ranks as one of the most important periods in scholarly communication history. Best, Greg Greg Tananbaum gtananbaum@gmail.com (510) 295-7504
- Prev by Date: Re: Is it time to stop printing journals?
- Next by Date: Dr. John Hoey Joins Scholarly Exchange Board
- Previous by thread: Re: Is it time to stop printing journals?
- Next by thread: RE: Is it time to stop printing journals?
- Index(es):