[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Yes, it's time (RE: Is it time to stop printing journals?)
- To: <liblicense-l@lists.yale.edu>
- Subject: Yes, it's time (RE: Is it time to stop printing journals?)
- From: "Rick Anderson" <rickand@unr.edu>
- Date: Sat, 31 Mar 2007 15:16:11 EDT
- Reply-to: liblicense-l@lists.yale.edu
- Sender: owner-liblicense-l@lists.yale.edu
> I am curious to hear whether this is a commonly held sentiment. I wouldn't call Scott's statement an expression of sentiment; it was an observation of what's happening among his patrons. And I would largely second it from the perspective of my institution. A few years ago we instituted a strict and explicit program of online preference for our journals -- if a journal is available online and someone wants us to acquire it in print, that person must submit a written justification to the Dean of Libraries. I think I can count on one hand the number of requests that we've received. The fact is that printed paper is a lousy format for distributing journal content. It's a great format for extended reading, but a terrible one for any other kind of information-seeking. > If this equation has indeed flipped in a matter of a half-dozen > or so years, this ranks as one of the most important periods in > scholarly communication history. I don't think there's any question that this is exactly the case. What's been remarkable to me is the range of responses to these dramatic changes -- library patrons have largely taken them in stride, few of them seemingly aware of the fundamental and radical nature of the changes that have taken place in the marketplace that serves them. Many of us in the library profession, meanwhile (though by no means all of us), are in denial, defending our traditional territory and furiously continuing to focus on the materials that our patrons are least interested in. Is it time to stop printing journals? Yes, and past time -- even in the humanities, where affection for print has tended to linger. Regardless of content, ink-on-paper is a highly wasteful and ineffective way to distribute discrete, article-sized chunks of information. It's also, by the way, time to stop thinking in terms of journal "issues" -- the issue is a meaningless construct that made sense only in the print realm. --- Rick Anderson Dir. of Resource Acquisition University of Nevada, Reno Libraries rickand@unr.edu
- Prev by Date: Re: Is it time to stop printing journals?
- Next by Date: Re: Is it time to stop printing journals?
- Previous by thread: RE: Is it time to stop printing journals?
- Next by thread: Re: Yes, it's time (RE: Is it time to stop printing journals?)
- Index(es):