[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Beating a dead Trojan horse (RE: Open Choice is a Trojan Horse for Open Access Mandates)
- To: <liblicense-l@lists.yale.edu>
- Subject: Beating a dead Trojan horse (RE: Open Choice is a Trojan Horse for Open Access Mandates)
- From: "Rick Anderson" <rickand@unr.edu>
- Date: Tue, 13 Mar 2007 19:21:41 EDT
- Reply-to: liblicense-l@lists.yale.edu
- Sender: owner-liblicense-l@lists.yale.edu
> Institutions are paying for subscriptions today. That is no > delusion. True enough. > There is little OA today. That is no delusion. OK. > Green self-archiving mandates will generate 100% OA. That is no > delusion. Well... yes. Universal mandates will generate 100% OA. Assuming universal compliance, that is. > What happens to subscriptions after that is speculation, not > delusion. Sorry to keep repeating this, but for some reason it keeps becoming necessary to repeat it: if the government requires that all articles be made immediately available to the public at no charge, then the idea that the public will spontaneously choose (against all reason) to pay for access to those articles is ridiculous. For libraries to invest taxpayers' money in ongoing subscriptions to journals that consist of such articles would be wanton irresponsibility. To dismiss this line of basic economic reasoning as "speculation" is absurd. Maybe a 100% Green world would be a wonderful place. But make no mistake: it would be a world largely bereft of paid subscriptions. --- Rick Anderson Dir. of Resource Acquisition University of Nevada, Reno Libraries rickand@unr.edu
- Prev by Date: Re: FW: Call for papers, reviewers and Editorial-Advisory Board members
- Next by Date: Re: Open Choice is a Trojan Horse for Open Access Mandates
- Previous by thread: D-Lib article about Cornell's Institutional Repository
- Next by thread: Scholarly Electronic Publishing Bibliography: 2006 Annual Edition
- Index(es):