[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
RE: Query Re Library Responsibility for Library Patrons' Use
- To: <liblicense-l@lists.yale.edu>
- Subject: RE: Query Re Library Responsibility for Library Patrons' Use
- From: "Rick Anderson" <rickand@unr.edu>
- Date: Sat, 24 Feb 2007 10:55:39 EST
- Reply-to: liblicense-l@lists.yale.edu
- Sender: owner-liblicense-l@lists.yale.edu
> Have any of you encountered this statement or a similar one? > How did you handle it? Thanks for your help. I've encountered it several times, and it's always been a walking point for us -- there's no way we would agree to license terms that hold the library institutionally responsible for end-user behavior. The library will accept responsibility for what it's capable of doing: informing end-users about the terms, doing what it can to prevent a breach of license terms, and acting quickly to cure a breach if it occurs. But to accept institutional responsibility for what patrons do would be insanity. In my experience, it's very rare that a publisher fails to see reason on this issue when it's clearly (and firmly) explained. In ten years of license negotiation, I think I've walked away from one deal over this issue. --- Rick Anderson Dir. of Resource Acquisition University of Nevada, Reno Libraries rickand@unr.edu
- Prev by Date: NetLibrary Announcement
- Next by Date: RE: STM Releases Related to EC Conference last week
- Previous by thread: Re: Query Re Library Responsibility for Library Patrons' Use
- Next by thread: RE: Query Re Library Responsibility for Library Patrons' Use
- Index(es):