[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
RE: PR's 'pit bull' takes on open access: excerpts from article in Nature Magazine
- To: <liblicense-l@lists.yale.edu>
- Subject: RE: PR's 'pit bull' takes on open access: excerpts from article in Nature Magazine
- From: "Lisa Dittrich" <lrdittrich@aamc.org>
- Date: Tue, 20 Feb 2007 17:52:13 EST
- Reply-to: liblicense-l@lists.yale.edu
- Sender: owner-liblicense-l@lists.yale.edu
For reasons I can't fathom, everyone seems to assume that journals are all housed at universities. As a Washingtonian, I know many many are housed at associations. In the case of our journal, there is a staff of six plus the editor, all of whom require salaries (and salaries that cover the cost of living in the expensive DC area) as well as health insurance. Unlike some journals, we do not subsidize our association--the reverse is true. And most of our authors do not receive grant funding; we have never even charged page charges, no less publication fees. I frankly get a little irritated when those who don't publish journals comment as if they were experts. (And I'm not singling out you, Charles). I know something about how subscriptions work for libraries, but I wouldn't presume to be an expert. The world of journal publishing is very varied, with all kinds of models in place. And the costs of publishing are not modest, even in the most bare bones environment. This is why many open access journals must rely heavily on subsidies PLUS author fees to operate. Lisa Dittrich Managing Editor Academic Medicine 2450 N Street, NW Washington, DC 20037 lrdittrich@aamc.org www.academicmedicine.org -----Original Message----- [mailto:owner-liblicense-l@lists.yale.edu] On Behalf Of Charles W. Bailey, Jr. Sent: Monday, February 19, 2007 7:00 PM To: liblicense-l@lists.yale.edu Subject: Re: PR's 'pit bull' takes on open access: excerpts from article in Nature Magazine Sally: People and infrastructure costs are indeed important. My assumption is that the SFU Library (and/or its parent institution) is subsidizing most of these costs (people, in this case, meaning technical support staff) and charging modest fees to recoup some incremental costs that are not covered by in-place, baseline human/technical/facility infrastructure. (Heather can clarify if this is not so.) The external "publishers" paying these modest fees then only have to worry about the costs of editorial and journal production support (the latter may be as simple as creating PDFs from Word files and putting them and metadata into OJS). Editorial support may be done entirely by volunteers, whose salaries are being paid as part of their real jobs by various universities and other organizations worldwide. http://software.lib.sfu.ca/docs/software.prices.pdf So, from the external "publishers" point of view, the only real costs are as outlined above, and, from the SFU Library point of view, the costs are not viewed as if there was no infrastructure already in place: to a large degree, it was there already for other purposes, and it is the incremental cost on top of this base that is required perform the new journal-hosting function that is viewed as their "real" cost. Best Regards, Charles Charles W. Bailey, Jr. E-Mail: cwbailey@digital-scholarship.com
- Prev by Date: Re: PR's 'pit bull' takes on open access: excerpts from article in Nature Magazine
- Next by Date: RE: Wikipedia?
- Previous by thread: Re: PR's 'pit bull' takes on open access: excerpts from article in Nature Magazine
- Next by thread: Re: PR's 'pit bull' takes on open access: excerpts from article in Nature Magazine
- Index(es):