[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: Data on circulation of books
- To: liblicense-l@lists.yale.edu
- Subject: Re: Data on circulation of books
- From: nmedeiro@haverford.edu
- Date: Tue, 13 Feb 2007 18:57:41 EST
- Reply-to: liblicense-l@lists.yale.edu
- Sender: owner-liblicense-l@lists.yale.edu
In 2002, the Tri-College Consortium (Bryn Mawr, Haverford, Swarthmore Colleges) undertook a collection assessment study as part of a Mellon-funded grant. We found that 57% of the books in our collection hadn't circulated since 1991, when the circulation module of our ILS was brought online (though presumably many of these 700,000+ books had circulated at some point in their lifetime). Thirty percent (30%) of circulating books acquired since 1990 hadn't circulated. The report is available at <http://www.clir.org/pubs/reports/pub115/contents.html>. -Norm On Mon, 12 Feb 2007 18:40:59 EST "Joseph J. Esposito" wrote: > Perhaps the members of this mailgroup can help me with some > questions about the circulation of books in academic libraries. > > A distinguished academic librarian told me that "most books never > circulate." Allowing for rhetorical exuberance, I was wondering > what the facts are behind "most" and "never." Is it that "many > books circulate only rarely," or "some books never circulate, but > a larger group circulates only rarely," or "almost all books > circulate, but a sizable portion circulates rarely,"--or some > other qualified formulation? [SNIP] > Joe Esposito
- Prev by Date: RE: Data on circulation of books
- Next by Date: Re: whither university presses?
- Previous by thread: RE: Data on circulation of books
- Next by thread: RE: Data on circulation of books
- Index(es):