[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: Stop fighting the inevitable - and free funds for open access!
- To: email@example.com
- Subject: Re: Stop fighting the inevitable - and free funds for open access!
- From: Sandy Thatcher <firstname.lastname@example.org>
- Date: Fri, 26 Jan 2007 17:40:33 EST
- Reply-to: email@example.com
- Sender: firstname.lastname@example.org
As a publisher (of journals as well as books) and as co-director of the Office of Digital Scholarly Publishing at Penn State, where we are developing with the support of a Mellon grant jointly with Cornell an open-source journal publishing platform known as DPubs, I find this a peculiar calculation of the cost of operating a journal. Surely, Heather Morrison knows better than to suggest that it only costs $509 to run a journal even using a "free" open-source system like OJS. Then what is the purpose of making such a claim, other than providing more propaganda for OA, denigrating further the Elseviers of the world, and trying to fool some people who may not know better? If we are going to engage in rational discussion of the pros and cons of OA, we need to get beyond simplistic analyses like this.
Penn State Press
Sanford G. Thatcher, Director
Penn State University Press
University Park, PA 16802-1003
There are some in the publishing community who are spendingsignificant sums fighting open access - for example, Naturerecently reported that AAP spent $300,000 - $500,000 in 2006, asreported in their article, PR's "pitbull" takes on open access -January 25, 2007. Funds that are currently being spent fighting open access arefunds that are not really needed for publishing per se, and so itis reasonable to ask, what might be accomplished if funds wereredirected from fighting open access, to implementing OA? This one expenditure by AAP is sufficient for hosting and supportservices for 785 open access journals using Open Journal Systems[disclosure: I work for SFU Library, one of the partners in thePKP project which produces OJS]. Note: OJS is free, open sourcesoftware; this estimate reflects the fee for cost-recovery forhosting and support. If Elsevier's annual U.S. lobbying budget were redirected to OApublishing - this would be enough for support and hosting forover 3,000 journals - much more than the 2,000 Elsevier currentlyproduces. There is more to publishing than hosting and support,of course; but then, the U.S. is not the only country for whichElsevier has a lobbying budget. For details and calculations, see my blogpost, "Stop fighting theinevitable - and free funds for open access! at:http://poeticeconomics.blogspot.com/2007/01/stop-fighting-inevitable-and-free.html Heather G. Morrison email@example.com
- Prev by Date: Re: PR's 'pit bull' takes on open access: excerpts from article in Nature Magazine
- Next by Date: Re: Just who is on the defensive?
- Previous by thread: Re: Stop fighting the inevitable - and free funds for open access!
- Next by thread: Re: Stop fighting the inevitable - and free funds for open access!