[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
RE: puzzled by self-archiving thread
- To: <liblicense-l@lists.yale.edu>
- Subject: RE: puzzled by self-archiving thread
- From: "Leah Krevit" <leah.krevit@exch.library.tmc.edu>
- Date: Wed, 27 Dec 2006 17:26:10 EST
- Reply-to: liblicense-l@lists.yale.edu
- Sender: owner-liblicense-l@lists.yale.edu
>Eventually, we have to pick subscriptions to cancel. If we >don't make our cancellation decisions based on usage and cost, >what criteria should we use? I don't ask that question >facetiously -- I'd be honestly interested to know, from a >publisher's perspective, what other criteria _would_ make sense. Rick, we are never happy with simple algorithms around here. No, the STM journal world is a complicated place. We not only consider use and cost, but impact factors as well. When looking at 8,000 in-scope journals which are critical to the research, education, and clinical care activities in the biomedical environment this library serves, finding titles to cut becomes a dangerous activity. So, we gather as much ammunition as we can before making those cancellation lists public. Having open access journals of high quality now helps ease the pain a bit, but each year is more of a nightmare--cut journals? Stop buying books? Pray the journal price increase will not exceed 5%? What about databases? Impact factors may not have the "impact" they once did, but they are still useful pieces of the overall data picture I have to present to faculty and biomedical researchers, who understand them. Happy New Year to all on this wonderful list!! Leah Krevit, M.L.I.S. Associate Director Collections Management Houston Academy of Medicine - Texas Medical Center Library Houston TX 77030-2809 713.799.7126 | 713.799.7180 fax leah.krevit@exch.library.tmc.edu http://resource.library.tmc.edu
- Prev by Date: STM Releases Statement on 'Orphan Works'
- Next by Date: Re: puzzled by self-archiving thread
- Previous by thread: RE: puzzled by self-archiving thread
- Next by thread: Re: puzzled by self-archiving thread
- Index(es):