[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
RE: puzzled by self-archiving thread
- To: <liblicense-l@lists.yale.edu>
- Subject: RE: puzzled by self-archiving thread
- From: "Morgan, James J" <morganj@iupui.edu>
- Date: Sun, 24 Dec 2006 22:25:36 EST
- Reply-to: liblicense-l@lists.yale.edu
- Sender: owner-liblicense-l@lists.yale.edu
There are a lot of ways of measuring use in libraries other than circulation. For print journals, one popular measure is the reshelving rate. If something is never taken off the shelf, we wonder why it's there. Of course all journals are not judged equally: a journal that has thousands of pages a year and a high cost that's little used might be judged more harshly than a low cost small footprint journal with the same amount of use. And of course there are journal citation reports, faculty requests, whether our institution is strong in a given area, etc. All of these come into play at my library when we decide to cancel a journal. Jim Morgan
- Prev by Date: Re: puzzled by self-archiving thread
- Next by Date: RE: puzzled by self-archiving thread
- Previous by thread: Re: puzzled by self-archiving thread
- Next by thread: RE: puzzled by self-archiving thread
- Index(es):