[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: Study Identifies Factors That Could Lead to Cancelled Subscriptions
- To: liblicense-l@lists.yale.edu
- Subject: Re: Study Identifies Factors That Could Lead to Cancelled Subscriptions
- From: Sandy Thatcher <sgt3@psu.edu>
- Date: Fri, 15 Dec 2006 17:01:16 EST
- Reply-to: liblicense-l@lists.yale.edu
- Sender: owner-liblicense-l@lists.yale.edu
There's another study, in less depth but covering some additional questions (such as how much of the content would need to be free) from ALPSP - see http://www.alpsp.org/publications/pub12.htmWhat is most interesting to me, comparing these two studies, is that they disagree sharply about the apparent value accorded to the "value added" by publishers through copyediting, etc. How does one explain this disparity?
Between the two, we do seem to have strong pointers to the likely dangers to subscription journals once self-archiving reaches critical mass (which may vary between disciplines, and even between journals)
It seems to me that we need to make research funders, governments etc very clearly aware of this dangerAnd that is precisely the purpose of the AAUP white paper in progress, which extends the warning beyond journals to monographs as well, even though they are not the subject of the current controversy.
Sandy Thatcher, Penn State University
Sally Morris, Chief Executive Association of Learned and Professional Society Publishers Email: sally.morris@alpsp.org Website: www.alpsp.org
- Prev by Date: Update to ProQuest Information & Learning Customers from PresidentDavid "Skip" Prichard
- Next by Date: puzzled by self-archiving thread
- Previous by thread: Re: Study Identifies Factors That Could Lead to Cancelled Subscriptions
- Next by thread: Wiley Launches Extensive Program to Digitize Landmark Book Series
- Index(es):