[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
RE: Study Identifies Factors that Could Lead to Journal Cancellations
- To: <liblicense-l@lists.yale.edu>
- Subject: RE: Study Identifies Factors that Could Lead to Journal Cancellations
- From: "Alma Swan" <a.p.swan@talk21.com>
- Date: Thu, 16 Nov 2006 11:03:36 EST
- Reply-to: liblicense-l@lists.yale.edu
- Sender: owner-liblicense-l@lists.yale.edu
Anthony Watkinson wrote: > Heather Morrison may well be right but there is one point she > makes and has made before which has to be challenged. ArChiv is > populated by preprints and not by postprints on the whole. When we checked this (in September 2005) the numbers of articles in arXiv were: Total records: 336829 Those with a complete journal reference: 173901 Those with an annotation saying "Accepted": 15772 i.e. around 56% of articles have postprint status. A further 14539 have an annotation saying "Submitted" and may be pre- or post- peer review. The rest have no discernible status and must in most cases be preprints. Alma Swan Key Perspectives Ltd Truro, UK
- Prev by Date: Draft report from Australian government recommends OA mandate (fwd)
- Next by Date: RE: Study Identifies Factors that Could Lead to Journal Cancellations
- Previous by thread: re: Study Identifies Factors that Could Lead to Journal Cancellations
- Next by thread: RE: Study Identifies Factors that Could Lead to Journal Cancellations
- Index(es):