[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: Lord Sainsbury on the RCUK OA Proposal: Drubbing Peter to Pox Paul
- To: AmSci Forum <american-scientist-open-access-forum@amsci.org>
- Subject: Re: Lord Sainsbury on the RCUK OA Proposal: Drubbing Peter to Pox Paul
- From: Stevan Harnad <harnad@ecs.soton.ac.uk>
- Date: Sun, 12 Nov 2006 18:01:45 EST
- Reply-to: liblicense-l@lists.yale.edu
- Sender: owner-liblicense-l@lists.yale.edu
Pertinent Prior AmSci Topic Threads:
"Lord Sainsbury on the RCUK OA Proposal: Drubbing Peter to Pox Paul
(began: Nov 2004)
http://www.ecs.soton.ac.uk/~harnad/Hypermail/Amsci/4131.html
http://www.ecs.soton.ac.uk/~harnad/Hypermail/Amsci/subject.html#4152
http://www.ecs.soton.ac.uk/~harnad/Hypermail/Amsci/4319.html
http://www.ecs.soton.ac.uk/~harnad/Hypermail/Amsci/4348.html
http://www.ecs.soton.ac.uk/~harnad/Hypermail/Amsci/4907.html
http://www.ecs.soton.ac.uk/~harnad/Hypermail/Amsci/4908.html
------------------------------------------------------------------
The following is from Peter Suber's Open Access News, 12 Nov
2006:
http://www.earlham.edu/~peters/fos/2006_11_12_fosblogarchive.html#116335233844648919
OBSTACLE TO STRONG OA POLICY IN THE UK STEPS DOWN
On Friday, Lord David Sainsbury stepped down from his position as
UK science minister. However we may hear from him on UK science
policy one more time before he leaves the public stage:
http://politics.guardian.co.uk/funding/story/0,,1945280,00.html
http://www.dti.gov.uk/pressroom/news/page35238.html
Lord Sainsbury has agreed to carry out a review of science and
innovation policies across government - taking a forward look at
what needs to be done to ensure the UK's success in wealth
creation and scientific policy-making. He will report to the
Chancellor and the Secretaries of State at DTI and the Department
for Education and Skills.
Sainsbury has been the Parliamentary Under-Secretary of State for
Science and Innovation in the Department of Trade and Industry
since July 1998. (Thanks to Matt Cockerill.)
More news coverage.
http://news.google.com/news?sourceid=navclient&ie=UTF-8&rls=GGLJ,GGLJ:2006-42,GGLJ:en&q=sainsbury&oe=UTF-8&sa=N&tab=wn
Comments.
1. David Sainsbury is the UK official most responsible for
rejecting the OA recommendations (July 2004) of the House of
Commons Science and Technology Committee.
http://www.publications.parliament.uk/pa/cm200304/cmselect/cmsctech/399/39903.htm
Those recommendations were based on extensive fact-finding and in
their basic terms have been reaffirmed and adopted by just about
every other government since then that has closely examined the
same issues.
http://www.publications.parliament.uk/pa/cm200304/cmselect/cmsctech/399/399ii.pdf
2. Thanks to a document unearthed by David Prosser through the UK
Freedom of Information Act, we know that during the time when
Sainsbury was supposed to be evaluating the OA recommendations,
he met with OA opponents roughly twice as often as with OA
proponents, and met with the Reed Elsevier CEO three times more
often than any other stakeholder.
https://mx2.arl.org/Lists/SPARC-OAForum/Message/2612.html
3. As a result of Sainsbury's partiality, strong OA policy in the
UK was delayed by about two years --the time between the House of
Commons recommendations (July 2004) and the adoption of the RCUK
policy (June 2006). And for the record, we should note that the
RCUK could adopt its strong OA policy only because it was
independent of Sainsbury's authority, as Sainsbury himself noted
in March 2005 testimony before the Science and Technology
Committee (scroll to Questions 20 and following).
http://www.publications.parliament.uk/pa/cm200405/cmselect/cmsctech/uc250-i/uc25002.htm
http://www.rcuk.ac.uk/access/2006statement.pdf
Permanent link to Peter Suber's OA News post:
http://www.earlham.edu/~peters/fos/2006_11_12_fosblogarchive.html#116335233844648919
------------------------------------------------------------------
Perhaps a grocer was not the best equipped to appreciate the
difference between research and retail...
Bravo to 5 of the 8 UK Research Councils for honouring the
difference just the same! Let's hope the US will have the good
sense to do likewise with the FRPAA, and Europe, with EC
Recommendation A1.
http://cornyn.senate.gov/doc_archive/05-02-2006_COE06461_xml.pdf
http://europa.eu.int/comm/research/science-society/pdf/scientific-publication-study_en.pdf
Stevan Harnad
- Prev by Date: WNPR program on the OARE project
- Next by Date: Re: Study Identifies Factors That Could Lead to
- Previous by thread: WNPR program on the OARE project
- Next by thread: Re: Study Identifies Factors That Could Lead to
- Index(es):
