[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Standardized Pricing Models - Periodicals
- To: liblicense-l@lists.yale.edu
- Subject: Standardized Pricing Models - Periodicals
- From: "Audrey Bondar" <abondar1@sladen.hfhs.org>
- Date: Fri, 20 Oct 2006 17:50:24 EDT
- Reply-to: liblicense-l@lists.yale.edu
- Sender: owner-liblicense-l@lists.yale.edu
I'm just about finished renewing our journal subscriptions for 2007. Each year I do this it becomes more complicated by the number of ways the various publishers establish pricing for their subscriptions. Gone are the good old days of individual price and institutional price with a few offering student pricing. A quick decision could be made based on the information provided. This lead me to think about consistency. A great deal of progress has been made with usage statistics. COUNTER compliant reports are available from more publishers and becoming somewhat of an industry standard. http://www.projectcounter.org/ Licensing models available from http://www.licensingmodels.com/ These standard licenses can be a useful reference for anyone dealing with electronic resource licensing. All this being said, it brought me to the thought of standardized pricing models. Could the basic methods of subscription price determination be simplified to 4 or 5 different methods? For example, tiered pricing. It seems that a fair number of publishers use this method of determining renewal costs but Tier 1 with one publisher can be very different from Tier 1 of another publisher. Could a standard be established that would be workable for both publishers and libraries? FTE renewals are frequently done but the criteria varies widely for this too. Basically this would be looking at the most frequently used methods of renewal and seeing if a generic schedule of some sort could be developed. Certainly not a simple project but one that would make selecting and renewing journals much easier. Any thoughts? Audrey Bondar Senior Information Resource Specialist Henry Ford Hospital Sladen Library Detroit, MI 48202 ============================================================================== Go to http://henryford.com We're Henry Ford. We Can. HFHS CONFIDENTIALITY NOTICE: This email contains information from the sender that may be CONFIDENTIAL, LEGALLY PRIVILEGED, PROPRIETARY or otherwise protected from disclosure. This email is intended for use only by the person or entity to whom it is addressed. If you are not the intended recipient, any use, disclosure, copying, distribution, printing, or any action taken in reliance on the contents of this email, is strictly prohibited. If you received this email in error, please contact the sending party by replying in an email to the sender, delete the email from your computer system and shred any paper copies of the email you printed. Note to Patients: There are a number of risks you should consider before using e-mail to communicate with us. These risks are described in our Privacy Policy at http://henryford.com. Review that policy carefully before continuing to communicate with us by e-mail. For greater Internet security, our policy describes the Henry Ford MyHealth electronic communication process - you may register at http://henryford.com. If you do not believe that our policy gives you the privacy and security protection you need, do not send e-mail or Internet communications to us. ==============================================================================
- Prev by Date: Additional detail on MIT and Hoovers
- Next by Date: RE: Column on licenses
- Previous by thread: Additional detail on MIT and Hoovers
- Next by thread: Cambridge 2007 Subscription Prices Now Available Online
- Index(es):