[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
RE: FTE-based pricing
- To: <liblicense-l@lists.yale.edu>
- Subject: RE: FTE-based pricing
- From: "Stefanie Wittenbach" <Stefanie.Wittenbach@utsa.edu>
- Date: Thu, 19 Oct 2006 16:20:00 EDT
- Reply-to: liblicense-l@lists.yale.edu
- Sender: owner-liblicense-l@lists.yale.edu
We're not talking about changing contract terms, just the annual price. With more and more resources going to COUNTER, use stats should be relatively easy to obtain. Stefanie -----Original Message----- From: owner-liblicense-l@lists.yale.edu [mailto:owner-liblicense-l@lists.yale.edu] On Behalf Of Richard Gottlieb Sent: Wednesday, October 18, 2006 6:19 PM To: liblicense-l@lists.yale.edu Subject: Re: FTE-based pricing Toby's proposal is quite logical. However quite impractical. It calls for the publisher to negotiate, monitor and periodically adjust the contract terms for every institutional subscription. Additional staff of one to three moderately competent staffers to manage a single journal. Now consider that a given publisher might have 10-30-50, or in the case of the giants, hundreds of journals.All of these costs will affect pricing negatively. Won't happen. Dick Gottlieb Grey House
- Prev by Date: Re: Pricing/License Translucency: A Proposal for Publishers and Libraries
- Next by Date: Re: Quality and mandated open access
- Previous by thread: RE: FTE-based pricing
- Next by thread: RE: FTE-based pricing
- Index(es):