[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
buried the lede?
- To: <liblicense-l@lists.yale.edu>
- Subject: buried the lede?
- From: "Hamaker, Charles" <cahamake@email.uncc.edu>
- Date: Tue, 17 Oct 2006 18:33:54 EDT
- Reply-to: liblicense-l@lists.yale.edu
- Sender: owner-liblicense-l@lists.yale.edu
Two of our publishers (on very different platforms) have come up with NO downloads in the last couple of months. One dropped from over 600 downloads in September of 2005 to 0 (none) in 2006. The other publisher shows no usage for the last two months. I personally believe it is because they've "hidden" the links to the full text on the abstracts page, they've made the links so unobtrusive to actually getting the article that it's difficult to FIND where to click to get the pdf or html. Has anyone else noticed this recently redesigned websites, drastic drops in the number of downloads? Both of these publishers' websites are relatively recent redesign. We contacted one of the publishers who assured us that the 0 stats were accurate even though I could find a number of click throughs from our Open URL resolver. Chuck Hamaker Associate University Librarian Collections and Technical Services Atkins Library University of North Carolina Charlotte Charlotte, NC 28223 phone 704 687-2825
- Prev by Date: PSP/AMPC Medical Practicum
- Next by Date: RE: FTE-based pricing
- Previous by thread: PSP/AMPC Medical Practicum
- Next by thread: IUBMB Selects Wiley to Publish Biochemistry and Molecular Biology Education
- Index(es):